Text Size:

03.25.2004

2002 Aubert Chardonnay, Ritchie Vineyard, Sonoma Coast

Mark Aubert has quite the resume: Rutherford Hills, MontiCello Cellars, Peter Michael Winery, Colgin Cellars, and since 2000, proprietor of his own label. In the decade and a half that he's been making wines, he's churned out his share of blockbusters to the accolades of Parker and Tanzer and the rest.

This week I had the opportunity to taste his recent efforts in the Chardonnay category, and even though this review is about only one of his wines, honestly I can't decide which one I like better. These wines also define a point where Mr. Parker and I see eye to eye. Here is his review of this wine (in the previous vintage):

"The 700-case lot of 2001 Chardonnay Ritchie Vineyard is smoky and hazelnut-like, with a liquid minerality. It is produced from a 38-year old Wente clone of Chardonnay. There is no doubting its similarity to a Batard Montrachet. The wine is stacked and packed, possessing impressive glycerin levels, intense fruit, and great purity and length. It will drink well for 4-5 years." 93-95

I have no idea what "stacked and packed" actually means nor where he's getting the smoky aromas -- but I agree with the sentiments. Here's what I think:

Tasting Notes:
This wine is everything a Chardonnay should be. Silky pale yellow gold and viscous in the glass, lifting itself up and into your nose with amazing scents of butter cream, golden delicious apples, and spring flowers (species indeterminate). In the mouth it's a model of perfection with a balance of acid and cool fruit supported by light brushings of oak and nuts. The finish is gorgeous with hints of spice, orange zest, and amazingly, the smell of the air just before it rains. This sounds outrageous, but honestly, it's a very distinct aroma, and it's in this wine. I love it.

So, I also want to throw in a note about the other Chardonnay (Quarry Vineyard) which is equally good: It is similar in structure with more apricot in the nose, a touch more acid, and more honeysuckle and pear flavors in the body of the wine. Impressive.

Food Pairing:
This wine can stand up to a lot of things that many Chardonnays could not. Because of its fruit component and oak I'd love to have it with anything that is creamy and buttery especially pastas and soups. Since its spring, and I've put away the creamy soup recipes until the fall, if I were going to drink this tomorrow I would have it with poached salmon with truffles and shimp in cream sauce.

Overall Score (for both wines):10

How Much?: $65 - 85 (both wines)

These wines are hard to get as they are immediately on allocation when released (no retailer gets as much as they want). As a result the price varies, and can be as high as $100. Wine Searcher shows a few Internet retailers carrying these wines.

Posted by: Alder on March 25, 2004 7:05 AM: Filed under: Perfect 10s , White Wine , Wine Reviews; Like this post? Share it! Digg it! - Add to del.icio.us - Add to Stumbleupon - Add to Reddit

Previous Entry - Main - Next Entry

TrackBacks (0)

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: 2002 Aubert Chardonnay, Ritchie Vineyard, Sonoma Coast.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.vinography.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5765

Comments (9)

Alder wrote:

04.02.04 at 8:53 AM

Interestingly, I just found out that the rain smell I describe above has a name:

Petrichor /'petriche(r)/
Noun. The smell of new rain on the dry ground.

Jack Kronfield wrote:

05.31.04 at 2:33 PM

Where are some retail outlets in San Francisco or Mill Valley, California, where I can purchase Richie Vineyard Aubert Chardonnay?

Thank you.

Jack

Noah wrote:

03.07.05 at 12:09 PM

Just got my allocation for 2003. Only tasted the 2002 ritchie once. hypnotic. Allocation seems fairly high as I can get about 2cs. total of the four offerings.

Ever bought wine for an investment? I haven't but this seems like it might be worthy...

Alder wrote:

03.07.05 at 7:50 PM

Yumm......

I think this wine will probably age beautifully if you choose to keep it, and you would definitely be able to sell it at a profit if you choose to do so. I've never bought wine for an investment. Some of the returns on big vintages though definitely outstrip the stock market.

StHelenaMontessoriSchool wrote:

04.02.05 at 12:48 PM

If you are interested in Aubert wines, there are several fantastic selections available through the St Helena Montessori School wine auction.

I have provided links to them below:

http://www.winecommune.com/lot.cfm/lotID/832562.html

http://www.winecommune.com/lot.cfm/lotID/832571.html

In addition, there is a multitude of fabulous and unique lots available as well.

http://www.winecommune.com/help/sthms.cfm

Good luck and thank you for your support!!

Steve-o wrote:

04.02.05 at 1:31 PM

I have a couple bottles of both the 2002 and the 2003. Shame about the spam to the comments, but I'm glad because it brought this older review back to the surface!

Not an easy to find wine, but well worth the effort.

Beau Zeaux wrote:

04.25.05 at 6:11 PM

The Auberts have decided that their wine is "too exclusive" to be tarnished by the hands of various wine merchants. As a result, the jolly fine 2003s will not be appearing at my favorite wine shops this spring!
I am sad, since I was able to purchase the 2002 at a couple of nice venues last year.

tim reuling wrote:

10.14.06 at 3:34 AM

All partiality aside, I recommend that you try the Aubert Reuling Chardonnay. It exhibits many of the same wonderful attributes as Ritche............although tigher and more characteristically Burgundian. Unfortunately, very hard to find.

Alder wrote:

10.15.06 at 11:37 AM

Tim,

Thanks for the comments. Didn't know it existed. I'll keep an eye out for it.