Text Size:-+

Where Malbec Comes From: Tasting the Wines of Cahors

One of my greatest pleasures as a wine lover (OK wine geek) is learning about a wine region by tasting a lot of wines. While I prefer to taste on location, there's just no way I can possibly get to all the different places I'd like to learn about until I become independently wealthy or permanently retired (and wealthy). Which really means there are a lot of wine regions I'll never get the chance to visit.

Luckily a lot of smaller wine regions are realizing that one way to improve the market for their wines internationally is the "wine roadshow" where a bunch of producers heads off to major target markets and with the help of a PR firm, puts on a tasting for the trade and media in a big city.

I find such events incredibly interesting, and valuable in the education of my palate. So when I got the invitation to a recent such tasting focused on the wines of Cahors, I jumped at the chance to go. Having only had maybe three or four wines from Cahors in my entire life, I was excited to clearly establish in my own mind "what Cahors tastes like."

The answer turned out to be rocks, wet dirt, leather, and a hint of cassis.

Cahors is a small wine region about 100km to the east and a little south of Bordeaux, centered around a town of the same name. Rich in history, the Medieval town has long been a center of wine production -- much longer, in fact, than Bordeaux itself. The Cahors appellation, or AOC, is focused on the production of a single red wine, which must be at least 70% Malbec, or as it is known locally Côt, Côt Noir, or to some, Auxerrois.

Once a critical blending grape in most Bordeaux wines, Malbec has largely disappeared from those wines, aided greatly by the Phylloxera epidemic that wiped out nearly all the vineyards in the early part of the 20th Century. Cuttings from these vineyards, shipped to Argentina in the late 1800's before this disastrous event, are responsible for that country's rise to prominence in Malbec production.

Indeed, the larger wine world might not know much of anything about Malbec were it not for Argentina, which has done a remarkable job of making inroads with American consumers especially, who have fallen in love with the fruit forward, rich Argentinean Malbecs that appear in increasing numbers on grocery and wine store shelves.

Now thanks to the much greater awareness of the grape internationally, the Cahors region seems to be taking the opportunity to wave its flag and remind people that Malbec came from somewhere else before it hit Argentina, and that Cahors would like some attention. With this in mind, the region has undertaken a branding campaign under the straightforward tagline, "Cahors: The French Malbec." Some producers are even starting to put the word "Malbec" on their labels.

It's an admirable effort, but after my experience at this tasting, I fear it is doomed to fail, at least with American consumers.

The reason is simple: Cahors wines taste absolutely nothing like Argentinean Malbec. And what's more, they don't taste like what most American consumers want from their wine.

I found the vast majority of the wines to be quite austere: granitic and earthy with often very aggressive tannins that left the mouth dry. The cassis and blue fruit notes that I associate with Malbec thanks to my exposure to an awful lot of Argentinean stuff, were very faint and in the background as aromatics mostly.

Now I should be clear that I think the worst thing in the world would be for Cahors to taste like Argentinean Malbec. It's from a different place, so it should taste different. But it should also be pleasurable, and to be frank, I struggled to find much in the wines I tasted last week. Even the few examples of aged wines, where the tannins had time to mellow, and secondary aromas time to emerge, still were angular and tart compositions of liquified rocks, leather, a hint of smoky meatiness, and a few nice notes of anise.

Having said that, the better wines were quite interesting for all that minerality, and showed remarkable variation across soil types, those grown in limestone offering a different character to those grown in the more red clay soils.

While the AOC regulations stipulate that the wines must be at least 70% Malbec, the ones on offer at this tasting were either 85%, 90% or 100% Malbec, with the balance being made up of Merlot (most often) or Tannat (rarely). Interestingly, many of the wineries made several styles of wines that often bore common (though to my knowledge not officially regulated) names. Wines labeled "Tradition" were usually fermented in steel, and not aged in oak at all, but rather bottled young for early release. Wines labeled "Prestige" were usually fermented entirely, or at least a portion in oak, and then likewise aged in (usually old, or neutral, but occasionally with a portion of new) oak for some period of time. In addition to these two wines, which many wineries offered, most also had a top wine that was aged in a portion of new oak barrels.

As I said, I struggled to like the majority of these wines. Struggled because on the one hand, I don't think any wine region should give up its traditional styles or methods of winemaking easily, but on the other hand, I didn't want to drink most of these wines, and I don't think most American wine lovers would either.

Of course, that may be fine for a certain set of wine lovers -- not much competition for these wines. But for a bunch of the wineries of Cahors, who clearly are out to try to capture more attention and market share in America, the road is going to be long and hard.


2005 Le Bout du Lieu "Empyree," Cahors. $35

2007 Château les Rigalets "La Quintessence," Cahors. $n/a
Dark garnet in the glass, this wine has a nose of farmyard, leather, and blackberry fruit aromas. In the mouth it offers lush, but firm tannins that envelop flavors of cassis, woodsmoke and black pepper that all dangle above a wet granite floor.

2007 Château St Didier "Prieure De Cenac," Cahors. $28
Medium garnet in color, this wine smells simultaneously of smoked meats and a stone outcropping in a rainstorm. Aromas of cassis and black cherry sneak in with some more air. In the mouth the wine has a supple leathery quality, with flavors of cassis and black cherry and an incredibly stony minerality that gives way slightly to some cherry notes that emerge again on the finish.

2005 Château Armandières Malbec "Ancestral," Cahors. $12
2007 Château les Rigalets "Prestige," Cahors. $n/a
2007 Château St Didier "La Vierge," Cahors. $40
2007 Château St Didier "Château De Grezels," Cahors. $20
2008 Château St Sernin, VDP du Lot $??
2002 Château Vincens "Les Graves de Paul," Cahors. $30
2006 Château Vincens "Prestige," Cahors. $20
2006 Le Bout du Lieu "Orbe Noir," Cahors. $23
2007 Mas Del Périe "Les Acacias," Cahors. $40
2007 Mas Del Périe "Les Escures," Cahors. $16
2007 Mas Del Périe "La Roque," Cahors. $23
2007 Métairie Grande du Théron "Prestige," Cahors. $25
2008 Métairie Grande du Théron "Prestige," Cahors. $25

2002 Château Armandières "Diamant Rouge," Cahors. $24
2007 Château Armandières "Diamant Rouge," Cahors. $24
2008 Château Cayx Malbec. Cahors. $48
2006 Château Cayx, Cahors. $24
2006 Chateau d' Eugénie "Tradition", Cahors. $10
2006 Chateau d' Eugénie "Reservee De L'Aieuil," Cahors. $20
2002 Château Paillas, Cahors. $n/a
2006 Château Pineraie Malbec, Cahors. $14
2007 Château Pineraie, Cahors. $12
2007 Château Pineraie "Authentique," Cahors. $40
2008 Château Vincens Malbec, Cahors. $13
2007 Le Bout du Lieu, Cahors. $14
2007 Les Roques de Cana "Sanguis Christi," Cahors. $50

2008 Château Cayx "Cuvee Majeste," Cahors. $70
2006 Chateau d' Eugénie "Pierre Le Grande," Cahors. $15
2004 Château de Cénac "Eulalie," Cahors. $30
2006 Château de Cénac "Prestige," Cahors. $??
2007 Château de Hauterive, Cahors. $12
2005 Château Paillas, Cahors. $n/a
2009 Château St Sernin Rosé, VDP du Lot $??
2006 Domaine du Prince "Lou Prince," Cahors. $38
2005 Domaine du Prince, Cahors. $10
2006 G. Vigouroux "Pigmentum," Cahors. $10
2007 Les Roques de Cana "Le Vin de Noces", Cahors. $30

2005 Château Bovilla, Cahors. $??
2006 Château du Port "Prestige," Cahors. $15
2008 Château Haute Borie "Prestige," Cahors. $25
2000 Château St Sernin "La Tour St. Sernin," Cahors. $30
2005 Château St Sernin "Prestige", Cahors. $18
2004 Domaine du Prince "Le Chene Du Prince," Cahors. $13
2005 La Coustarelle "Eclat," Cahors. $n/a
2008 Métairie Grande du Théron "Tradition," Cahors. $15

2005 Château de Hauterive "Prestige," Cahors. $18
2008 Château de Hauterive, Cahors. $12
2009 Château Haute Borie "Tradition," Cahors. $15
2008 Château Haute Borie "Tradition," Cahors. $15
2007 Château Paillas, Cahors. $n/a
2008 Château St Sernin "Varua Maohi Mana" Malbec, Cahors. $18
2006 La Coustarelle "Tradition," Cahors. $25

2007 Clos De Troteligotte "La Fourmi," Cahors. $11
2006 Clos De Troteligotte "La Perdrix," Cahors. $18
2006 G. Vigouroux Chat "Haute Serre," Cahors. $22

2006 Clos De Troteligotte "CQFD," Cahors. $38
2006 La Coustarelle "Grande Cuvee Prestige," Cahors. $45

2005 Domaine du Prince "Rossignol," Cahors. $n/a

2005 G. Vigouroux Chat "Mercues Prestige," Cahors. $50

Comments (19)

03.15.10 at 12:47 AM

Why hold these tastings when the best from the appellation aren't there? Where are, for example, Château du Cèdre, Château Lagrezette, or Clos Triguedina?

Bob wrote:
03.15.10 at 5:39 AM

Before I read the first comment, I had the same thought as King Krak.

NickG wrote:
03.15.10 at 7:06 AM

If you had these wines with some hearty southwestern French food like duck breast or cassoulet, I suspect your opinion on at least some of them would be different.

Michel wrote:
03.15.10 at 7:15 AM

Don't forget Clos la Coutale. I also agree that with food, some of the wines would be viewed very differently.

Alder Yarrow wrote:
03.15.10 at 7:19 AM


Sadly, I doubt it. I tried many of these wines with food, and while the food did scrape the tannins off the teeth, it didn't markedly improve the wines or affect the astringent qualities many of them had. These wines are far too tannic to be enjoyed with cassoulet or most preparations of duck in my personal opinion.


Evan Dawson wrote:
03.15.10 at 9:32 AM


Can you address the first commenter's question? As a writer in the Finger Lakes, I tend to cringe when I see a gaggle of Finger Lakes Rieslings go out that doesn't include the top producers. But I suppose the wider selection is indicative of what people might get on a more regular basis.

(For what it's worth, your description of the wines in general is extremely appealing to me.)

amy wrote:
03.15.10 at 9:51 AM

As always, nice to see you at the tasting. I agree that the wines were difficult to embrace, but tend to think that food really would have helped several of them (or at least hope that it would). Like you, I have tried a few before, but not many. I liked best the Domaine Le Bout Du Lieu Empyree and the Mas Del Perie Les Acacias.

Alder Yarrow wrote:
03.15.10 at 9:52 AM


Your second sentence nails it.

But some more detail: it's quite rare, actually for these big press tours to include the absolute top producers, and always extra exciting when they do.

There are a number of reasons for this in my experience. Firstly, top producers have no problems selling out their wines and therefore don't need to spend money on this kind of marketing effort, which I'm sure is not cheap (even if you're just talking about the costs of flying over to America with your wines).

Secondly, apart from the buy-in costs to such efforts, I've never met a regional wine promotion tour like this that wasn't political in terms of who ended up on it and didn't. Just like some wineries opt out of trade associations, I'm sure there are those that would never show up to such an event.

But, having said all that, I definitely agree with King Krak -- if you really wanted to showcase a region you'd want to get some of the best wines to the tasting if you possibly could -- as the Alto Adige tasting I attended a couple of weeks ago did. I'll be writing that one up later this week.


jkviader wrote:
03.15.10 at 5:19 PM

i've been curious about the wines from this reason for a while, since a friend of mine at oregon state once put together a malbec tasting for the enology program. unfortunately he was unable to get a cahors malbec in time for the tasting, but it sounds like the argentine selection might have won out in that blind tasting. thanks for the guidance on producers and i'm glad the commentators could refer readers to the top houses.

03.15.10 at 10:05 PM

As always, taste is subjective. I really like the Cousterelle wines, which I find lean and minerally with taut tannins in a pleasant way. (And aging nicely in my cellar.) Yet I can relate to why you didn't like them for much the same reasons. Whatever, I totally agree with you that promoting Cahors as Malbec is a double-edged sword - it will gain more attention and trial, the question is whether fans of Argentinian Malbec will like what they find there. It would be interesting to compare the take on these wines of a bunch of Argentine Malbec fans vs. some Bordeaux fans or Chianti fans.

Alfredo wrote:
03.16.10 at 8:19 AM

I really like your post. Especially when you mentioned your reasons to believe that American consumers will not like Cahors Malbec: “…Cahors wines taste absolutely nothing like Argentinean Malbec”.

You see, in a world were the real:
Pinot Noir is Côtes de Beaune, never Napa.
Cabernet and Merlot are Bordeaux, Not Maipo
Shiraz is Rhône, not Hunter Valley…
Sauvignon blanc is Loire, never Marlborough…

To have a wine from the new world setting the standard for the test profile of a grape is, beside an Argentinean cleaver marketing move, just…. LOVELY.

Saying that, I think you (and readers) will find really interesting to taste the “New black wine” by Jean Luc Valdes. The wine was popular in the middle ages in England, is strong and obscure, and made by heating the bunches or must, producing this particular must. Super interesting, and bloody expensive!

scott wrote:
03.16.10 at 9:25 AM

Alder – I cringe when someone like you makes a blanket statement that Americans just won’t like these French Cahors. Does an American like a certain style of wine because it’s so deeply engrained in our culture, or is it because “influencers” (you, other critics, conglomerates, marketing, advertising, etc.) convince us what we’ll like?

Mark wrote:
03.16.10 at 10:07 AM

It's gonna be a tough road for sure. But in general, I do think that most drinkers are interested in trying something different. No doubt, Malbec from Cahors is completely different from Argentina. That's what I really love about it though. It's a wonderful way to show someone the difference between a Old World wine and a New World wine, while also driving home the meaning of terrior.

Alder Yarrow wrote:
03.16.10 at 12:36 PM


Thanks for the comment, and I know, I know. But while I fight against the tunnel vision that Americans have to wine styles, the reality is that these wines A) were not very good and B) were so outside what Americans clearly like (as measured by their purchasing $$, as well as my personal experience offering all kinds of different wines to non-wine-geek people) I am willing to make such a categorical statement.

If these wines sat on the shelf at Trader Joes and people randomly picked them out to try, half of them would return the wines because they "tasted bad" and the rest would not be coming back to buy a case, if you know what I mean. Of course, that's just one man's opinion.

As for my role (and others') as a critic, fair enough, but when _I_ don't like the wines, I have a hard time convincing others that they will.

Errol Craig wrote:
03.17.10 at 10:54 AM

Some other thoughts on the 'black wines' of Cahors. If my memory serves me correctly, the Bordelais, which control the river outflow from this region would historically not allow Cahors wines to be sold until first all of their supply was sold. And thus there would be years when no Cahors could go to market. And how to handle that? Plant the grapes that will give your the darkest most tannic wine, with the most staying power that can just sit around until the opportunity presents to make sail for England (or wherever).

So if this account is correct, Cahors is planted with Malbec not because its the best grape for the soil and climate, rather its the best grape for the market conditions.
I wonder how the appelation would do with some of the other bordeaux varietals - I bet Merlot would fare very well. Incidentally if you go there and you look hard you can find wines from the region with non-permitted grapes, but they are labelled Vin-de-pays du Lot.

Paul Jameson wrote:
03.19.10 at 8:57 AM

I made it to the Cahors event when it came to Washington DC. I had a slightly different take on it than you, finding that Cahors wines might go better with food than some Argentinian Malbecs, and people might want to give it a try for certain dishes.

03.22.10 at 4:34 PM

I think Malbec needs time and a warm year to succeed.I have had decade old Cahor that were sublime and Argentine Malbec's from the Caves Weinert from the early 1980's that were ethereal .

Frank wrote:
04.04.10 at 6:25 PM

Ok.The Argentine malbec is artistic.
Achaval,Cobos,Monte Cinco

Anonymous wrote:
05.17.10 at 12:17 PM

Very interesting article. I've never tried a Cahors Malbec but I'm quite familiar with Argentine ones, and I'd imagine that the terrior would be quite different indeed. The Mendoza region of Argentina is one of the highest altitude major wine regions of the world. The high altitude brings intense sunlight, producing grapes with thicker skins, and deep flavor. I'd be interested to try a Cahors wine just to compare/contrast.

Comment on this entry

(will not be published)
(optional -- Google will not follow)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Buy My Book!

small_final_covershot_dropshadow.jpg A wine book like no other. Photographs, essays, and wine recommendations. Learn more.

Follow Me On:

Twitter Facebook Pinterest Instagram Delectable Flipboard

Most Recent Entries

Vinography Images: Divine Droplets Bay Area Bordeaux: Tasting Santa Cruz Mountain Cabernets US 2014 Vintage - Early, Fast, Eventful Vinography Images: Big Shadow Come Explore The Essence of Wine with Me in Healdsburg: October 30th, 2014 Vinography Unboxed: Week of October 5, 2014 Another Idiotic California Law Screws Wineries Vinography Images: Vineyard Reflections The Fake Tongue Illusion and Wine Tasting 2014 Wine & Spirits Top 100 Tasting: October 21, San Francisco

Favorite Posts From the Archives

Masuizumi Junmai Daiginjo, Toyama Prefecture Wine.Com Gives Retailers (and Consumers) the Finger 1961 Hospices de Beaune Emile Chandesais, Burgundy Wine Over Time The Better Half of My Palate 1999 Királyudvar "Lapis" Tokaji Furmint, Hungary What's Allowed in Your Wine and Winemaking Why Community Tasting Notes Sites Will Fail Appreciating Wine in Context The Soul vs. The Market 1989 Fiorano Botte 48 Semillion,Italy

Archives by Month


Required Reading for Wine Lovers

The Oxford Companion to Wine by Jancis Robinson The Taste of Wine by Emile Peynaud Adventures on the Wine Route by Kermit Lynch Love By the Glass by Dorothy Gaiter & John Brecher Noble Rot by William Echikson The Science of Wine by Jamie Goode The Judgement of Paris by George Taber The Wine Bible by Karen MacNeil The Botanist and the Vintner by Christy Campbell The Emperor of Wine by Elin McCoy The World Atlas of Wine by Hugh Johnson The World's Greatest Wine Estates by Robert M. Parker, Jr.