Text Size:-+
05.21.2010

Some Thoughts on Australian Wine

Anyone who reads Vinography with any regularity would know that I spent some time in Australia recently on a press trip. I got the chance to visit a lot of wineries in both Victoria and South Australia, in the regions of Yarra Valley, King Valley, Beechworth, Heathcote, Adelaide HIlls, McLaren Vale, and the Barossa Valley.

My two week trip by no means made me an expert on Australian wine, but it did significantly increase my understanding of what Australian wine is all about, what's going on in the country, and it certainly expanded my horizons when it comes to Australian wine.

I've of course been posting my reviews of wines and stories of wineries that I visited on this trip, but I also collected some random observations about Australian wine that I offer below, with no presumption of profundity. These are just some of the things I learned and encountered during my trip.

Old Vines
One of the things I was quite excited to see more of (more than my brief trip to the Hunter Valley 9 years ago afforded me) were old vines. Australia has some of the oldest grapevines in the world, thanks to its geographical remove from the rest of the world, and its relative lack of the vine-killing pest Phylloxera. From the century-old Grenache growing a stones throw from the beach in McLaren Vale to the gnarled 150-year-old Shiraz of Barossa Valley, these bush vines are mighty impressive. In particular I was struck by both the massive trunks of a 100-year-old Shiraz vine, as compared with the relative spindly nature of an equally old Mourvedre vine. One of the highlights of the trip was stopping by the famous Hill of Grace vineyard (which isn't on a hill, but merely on a flat strip of land in front of a church named Hill of Grace) owned by the Henschke family.

Diversity and the Small Winery
I like to spend time visiting wine regions to understand them at a greater depth and to see a wider breadth of production than would ordinarily be visible in the U.S. Our experience of Australian wine in the United States, despite the concerted, valiant efforts of many importers and retailers, will always be somewhat limited based on the calculus of demand on the one hand, and availability on the other.

As someone who has made a concerted effort to taste a lot of Australian wine (at trade tastings, large public tastings, etc.) I was surprised at how much my experience of Australian wine seemed pretty narrow compared to what was on offer there. I visited only a small portion of the many wine regions in the country, but encountered a much wider range of wines (styles and grape varieties) than are typically found here at home.

In large part, much of this diversity existed at smaller wineries. Indeed, some of the most exciting wines I had in Australia are made by tiny producers who don't make much wine, and export even less to the U.S.

It seemed rather clear to me that Australia hasn't figured out a way to easily make this diversity available to the world at large, perhaps as a result of scale, but perhaps also as a result of a focus of its energy on "simpler" ways of communicating to global consumers about Australian wine.

Australia (by which I mean primarily the Australian Wine and Brandy Corporation, the main trade body in the country) should be celebrating and promoting its smaller producers more.

Lack of Labor and Mechanical Harvesting
I was surprised to see so much mechanical harvesting in Australia even among some of the more premium producers. This turned out to be a function of labor availability. While Australia is a country populated with immigrants, that is purely a historical phenomenon. The country does not benefit from the constant influx of immigrants (or merely migrants) from the developing world that manages to produce large pools of low cost field labor in so many other countries. While there exists enough labor (though expensive) to hand harvest smaller vineyards, and the precious, ancient bush-vines that cannot be harvested by machine, any winery of a certain size generally must harvest by machine. I wrote last week about whether this practice necessarily had a negative impact on wine quality. My feeling is that while I have certainly had good wines that have been machine harvested, my anecdotal experience leads me to believe that machine harvesting may at least limit the quality of wine, if not negatively impact it.

Always Acidulating
"Any winemaker in Australia who tells you they don't acidulate is lying," said one winemaker in the course of my visit. I only met one winemaker who swore up and down that never, under any circumstances, did acid get added to his wines. I met a couple more who say that most of the time they don't have to add anything, one of which offered to show me the sack of tartaric acid in his cellar that had a date stamp from 10 years ago and only had about 20% missing.

No one likes to talk about acidulation in Australia (sort of like no one likes to talk about watering back in California, or chaptalization in Burgundy), but it's clear that it is pretty pervasive. I was surprised at this and still haven't fully resolved how I feel about it. On the one hand, the fact that winemakers have to add acid seems to indicate that they're doing something wrong. The most extreme reaction to this practice might be to suggest people are growing the wrong grapes in the wrong places, the wrong way. Of note, the two wineries (Jasper Hill and Yarra Yering) that had the most credible claims of no use of acid are both dry farmed.

On the other hand, what's a little acid between friends? Especially if it results in delicious wines that clearly speak of a place? I'm not dogmatic about my wine, and I am of the opinion that wine is never truly a natural phenomenon, depending as it does on at least some intervention by humans to remain wine instead of vinegar. A little acid, a little commercial yeast, and a little sulfur dioxide do not turn a wine into industrial swill in my book, though some purists will doubtless vehemently disagree.

I think there is too much good wine being made in Australia to take the position that the pervasive use of acidulation represents a fundamental failure, but at the same time, I wish it wasn't necessary. As I'm sure most Australians do too.

Increasing Australian Biodynamics
Biodynamic winegrowing and winemaking seems to be increasing in frequency and visibility in Australia. I had a chance to meet with a number of both the pioneers as well as the newer biodynamic vintners in my travels and I was struck by a consistent streak of pragmatism that ran through them all. Nearly every single one expressed dismay at what they saw as the commercialization of biodynamics. They strenuously objected to the idea of the term biodynamics having been trademarked, as well as the certification regimens that exist. Several of them indicated that they didn't think they could ever be certified, even if they wanted to, because they didn't use all the proscribed preparations. Many suggested that a few of the preparations (such as 501) were wholly inappropriate for Australia, given the heat, intense UV, and natural vigor of the vines. More than one made note of the fact that biodynamics attempts to offer a wholly natural, closed system of farming, yet in Australia in order to be biodynamic they have to import cows horns and introduce a non-native animal product to the soil in order to "do it properly." To some, like winemaker Dave Powell at Torbreck, the proscriptive and somewhat inflexible nature of the biodynamic regimen isn't matched to Australian circumstance. "Look," he says, "Cows aren't native to Australia, and for that matter, neither are grapevines. If you wanted to be truly biodynamic here you'd have to take a didgeridoo and stuff it full of kangaroo shit and bury that in the vineyard."

The Fall from Grace and the Grateful Palate Backlash
There seems to be a consensus, at least in the critical press, that Australian wine has fallen out of favor in America and even more so, the UK. I spent a lot of time speaking with winemakers and other people in the industry about whether and why this is so. Many seemed to think that in addition to the GFC (the Australian ubiquitous acronym for Global Financial Crisis) Australian wine was indeed suffering a bit, if only at the hands of the media and what people referred to as the upper echelons of the wine industry. Most characterized the problem as a two-fold issue: first, the massive corporate wine giants (many of whose brands are ONLY sold overseas) flooding the US and the UK to the point that people are tired of the critter brands and are conditioned to think of Australian wine as something that costs less than $5; secondly, that after several years of hype over huge, extracted, high-alcohol wines from the Barossa (Mollydooker was named as a poster child for this excess), collectors were tasting these wines with five or eight years on them and realizing they were falling apart.

In particular two parties came under sharp attack for this phenomenon: Jay Miller (and by association, Robert Parker) and Dan Philips whose company The Grateful Palate and whose wine brand Marquis Philips are seen as having championed (and massively profited) from this style of wine in the US. The Grateful Palate, like many wine concerns these days, has fallen on hard times.

In Closing, Sort Of
I returned from Australia extremely excited about the country as a wine producer, and quite excited to return some day to explore Western Australia, Tasmania, the Mornington Penninsula, and other regions where I think there is a lot of exiting wine being made, and to be made in the future. I highly recommend it as a destination for wine lovers, especially those interested in a vacation that includes more than just some time spent in wine country.

Comments (12)

05.22.10 at 7:36 AM

Very interesting, re:biodynamics in Australia. I know that there are many producers (in Europe and elsewhere) who, although they use biodynamic principles, shy away from certifying themselves as organic because of all the beaurocratic loopholes they would have to jump through to be certified. How ironic that if the Aussies wanted to be truly bio, they would have to actually IMPORT the products needed to be considered biodynamic.

The London International Wine Fair just finished up here this week and one Aussie winemaker I spoke to told me that they have a huge wine surplus and that they are busy pulling vines to alleviate the problem of excess juice and thus the flooding of the market of those cheap Aussie wines. They are focusing on getting the consumer to buy their premium wines but I think it will be a hard slog to get them to consider Australian wines as premium and pay accordingly, at least here in the UK.

Jason wrote:
05.22.10 at 7:33 PM

What kind of moron buys a wine like Mollydooker and tries to age it? That's like buying a Hummer and then saying "turns out, it didn't get good gas mileage". Is anybody really that stupid, or was this just an off-handed anecdote stretched beyond its relevance? Also - the comment about Philips "massively profiting" - any source for that, or is that similarly uninformed? I know Dan, I've even been to his home and if he massively profited, he certainly hides it well.

Warren wrote:
05.22.10 at 7:56 PM

Great series of notes and a good summary Alder.

While I agree with the points made above around responsibility for the fall in popularity of Australian wine, I think there is a third reason. That reason is the result of the takeover of SouthCorp by Rosemont, the consequent appointment of a Rosemount family member to the CEO role in the new entity and his obsession with rationalisation and discounting. What he managed to acheive was a massive cheapening of Brand Australia, particularly in the UK where he chased market share but indulging in insane discounting promotions. That is the reason why the UK maket will not recognise Australia as a producer of Premium wine.

And bear in mind that the big wine companies are just that. Big Wine Companies, making branded wine to a price point, hiding behind a few (eg Penfolds) heavily marketed brand names. Big Wine Companies sell branded products that happen to be wine. Smaller wine producers produce artisanal products to the best of their ability.

I think one of Australia's biggest challenges though, is that brands rule. Winemakers can buy in grapes from anywhere to make wine. I would prefer to see a system where producer X produces wine from its own farm, or estate instead of just producing wine that requires a careful read of the back label to see where it comes from.

Alder Yarrow wrote:
05.22.10 at 8:32 PM

Jason,

In both cases: consumers drinking Mollydooker after a few years, and the characterization of Dan having "massively" profited from his ventures, I am reporting on the characterizations made by many of the folks I spoke to in the Australian wine industry. Perhaps I could have made that more clear.

But to your points about aging... you clearly have no sense of the behaviors of the wine collector segment of the market if you think that everyone buying high-scoring mollydooker wines are consuming them withing 12-24 months. There are 8000 bottles of 2005 Mollydooker available for sale on the Vinfolio marketplage, and there are more than 4000 bottles of 2005 that have not yet been drunk on Cellartracker. The wines may not be ageworthy, but that has never stopped wine collectors from hoarding high-scorers.

Brigitte Armenier wrote:
05.23.10 at 12:08 PM

"Biodynamic winemaking"… again?! :) At least the principle of reality is applied with a paragraph developed around farming only.
Ironically, it is a similar application of this principle of reality that prohibits the certification of vineyards which haven't received the whole of the nine biodynamic preparations. Biodynamists, unlike Biodynamics users, recognize the fact that rights come with duties. One of the latter being definitively the respect and understanding of the essence of Biodynamics, which as a result cancels the references made for instance to "heat and UV" in order to avoid the use of the BD #501. Shall I add that I lived in Australia and did experience first-hand the importance of ALL the preparations for this region of the earth?
To end with, one must think agriculture out of the domain of life for excluding it from the relations between innate and acquisitive… And personally, I find Kevin Rudd's words on February 13, 2008 far more worth remembering.

Tony Bogar wrote:
05.23.10 at 5:01 PM

Thoughtful comments, Alder, and they could spark discussions spanning many days - and many bottles. I just want to say thanks for your closing comment: "I highly recommend it as a destination for wine lovers". That surely is the best way to understand any region's wines.

Alder Yarrow wrote:
05.23.10 at 8:41 PM

I just realized that I left off a paragraph when I published this article, so I have republished it again. Please see the added paragraph on acidulation.

Greg wrote:
05.24.10 at 12:34 AM

Alder, your comments on acidulation are certainly correct, I make small amounts of wine and if I am not sure about my ph meter I check it with a commercial wine; Australian red wines always come in at 3.4 on the nose, very handy for a rough check.Here in Australia you won't here the term acidulation, it is just regarded as ph correction. A high pH means a wine is less stable and more prone to infection.

A feature of inland Australia is the reliable long, warm, sunny autumns. I believe you sampled this recently. In these conditions grapes ripen very well but the acidity falls to low levels.

If you do some ph testing of californian red wines you would probably be surprised how often you would get 3.4, the target pH for wine.

Greg Perrett wrote:
05.24.10 at 12:34 PM

This comment:

It seemed rather clear to me that Australia hasn't figured out a way to easily make this diversity available to the world at large

...for me captures the number one problem for Australian fine wine. It is a problem elsewhere as well, but Australia is the one I am most aware of.

Great summary. I hope you go back soon!

Cheers
Greg

Renie Steves wrote:
05.24.10 at 3:47 PM

Life's pleasures evolve from good food and/or wine experiences, but those don't seem to come around so often without the stability of family and friends. Yes, I remember tasting a Grange from the mid-80s when visiting Penfolds in the 90s. But just as important was learning to call a friend a 'mate' and mastering the 'Australian wave' as the black cloud of flies ascended on us in the Outback. Barossa Valley showed us the importance of eating and drinking local a decade before we Americans began touting that topic.

You are so right Alder, it's an understanding of the lifestyle that can only be achieved by spending some time with the people in their country. It is preferable that they produce wine!

Moshe Ben Zvi wrote:
06.16.10 at 6:01 PM

Dan Phillips R wines gone bust - why not check that out?

Richard G. wrote:
11.10.10 at 8:04 PM

Australia has over 2,500 wineries, most of which are hand crafted single estate producers. The myth that Australia is one big tank is just that. Sure, there are no regulations on what varieites can be grown where, but most regions do have a long tradition of growing one or two varieties over others.
There are lots of reasons why you don't see these boutique wines in the US - but they are probably the same as why you can only find a handful of US producer wines on Australian shelves - and pretty well none of them boutique.

Comment on this entry

(will not be published)
(optional -- Google will not follow)
Yes
 

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Pre-Order My Book!

small_final_covershot_dropshadow.jpg A wine book like no other. Photographs, essays, and wine recommendations. Learn more.

Follow Me On:

Twitter Facebook Pinterest Instagram Delectable Flipboard

Most Recent Entries

Vinography Images: Into the Tank 72 Pinot Noirs on a Sunny Afternoon: Tasting at IPNC 2014 The Great White South: An Introduction to Châteauneuf-du-Pape Blanc Vinography Images: Along the Row Time For The World's Best Prison Wine Coastal Diamonds: The Rieslings of Oregon Vinography Images: The Red Window Taking Celebrity Wine to the Next Level Vinography Images: The Blue Berry 2014 Family Winemakers Tasting: August 17, San Mateo

Favorite Posts From the Archives

Masuizumi Junmai Daiginjo, Toyama Prefecture Wine.Com Gives Retailers (and Consumers) the Finger 1961 Hospices de Beaune Emile Chandesais, Burgundy Wine Over Time The Better Half of My Palate 1999 Királyudvar "Lapis" Tokaji Furmint, Hungary What's Allowed in Your Wine and Winemaking Why Community Tasting Notes Sites Will Fail Appreciating Wine in Context The Soul vs. The Market 1989 Fiorano Botte 48 Semillion,Italy

Archives by Month

 

Required Reading for Wine Lovers

The Oxford Companion to Wine by Jancis Robinson The Taste of Wine by Emile Peynaud Adventures on the Wine Route by Kermit Lynch Love By the Glass by Dorothy Gaiter & John Brecher Noble Rot by William Echikson The Science of Wine by Jamie Goode The Judgement of Paris by George Taber The Wine Bible by Karen MacNeil The Botanist and the Vintner by Christy Campbell The Emperor of Wine by Elin McCoy The World Atlas of Wine by Hugh Johnson The World's Greatest Wine Estates by Robert M. Parker, Jr.