Text Size:-+

A Firestorm of Speculation Over Robert Parker's "Retirement"

Robert_M._Parker_cropped.jpgTwitter and the Blogosphere erupted with chatter this morning as Lettie Teague's article in the Wall Street Journal entitled "Big Shake-Up at Robert Parker's Wine Advocate" hit the paper's web site. Teague reported that Parker "intends to phase out the print version of the newsletter" and begin accepting advertising, as part of a series of changes that will correspond with "selling a 'substantial interest' in the Wine Advocate to a trio of Singapore-based investors who will take over its day-to-day financial operations." Teague went on to suggest that the company's headquarters would be moved to Singapore as a result.

But by far the biggest point of interest was the announcement that Parker "intends to step down as its editor in chief, turning over editorial oversight to his Singapore-based correspondent, Lisa Perrotti-Brown."

Based largely on Teague's article, tweets, blog posts, and articles erupted all over the web proclaiming that The Wine Advocate had been sold, Parker was retiring, and that this was the end of an era. Gasps were heard as people suggested that Antonio Galloni had been passed over as anointed heir-apparent in favor of Perotti-Brown, and that the rest of the writers were soon to be replaced with random contractors.

Many of the claims, speculation, and facts in these stories, including many of the facts reported in Teague's article, didn't seem to match the announcement that Parker made to his own subscribers on his bulletin board. Apparently in an effort to counter the spread of these assertions, Parker spend some time on Twitter earlier today to state the facts.

So let's run them down as described by Parker on Twitter and in his announcement on his private bulletin board:

1. A portion of the Wine Advocate enterprise has been sold to three young "30-early 40ish" investors in Singapore.

2. Parker intends to open "an office" in Singapore, though the Wine Advocate will remain headquartered in Monkton, Maryland.

3. Lisa Perotti-Brown will be taking over as day-to-day editor of the publication, including all the copy-editing and other logistics of publishing.

4. Parker, while stepping down as Editor-in-Chief, will continue to review the wines of Bordeaux and the Rhone. In short, he is retiring as editor, but not as a wine critic or writer. He will remain CEO and Chairman of the Board.

5. The print version of the newsletter is not going away for the foreseeable future, and will "never" contain advertising. The company plans to begin accepting online advertising from non-wine producing companies, and plans to release a PDF version of the newsletter for subscribers.

6. The company plans to expand its activities surrounding events, tastings, and other educational opportunities, including "virtual tastings, icon wine program, wine education seminars..." No word on just what an "icon wine program" might mean.

While this is all certainly big news for the wine world, it is lesser news than some might think. My buddy Eric Asimov wrote a nice piece about the changes this morning, though before some of the facts of the announcement were clarified.

Eric, and certainly many others, see this step as one more step towards the dismantling of the hegemony that Parker (along with the Wine Spectator) have held over the critical assessment of wine in America. But looking at these moves from the point of view strictly of business, these announcements appear to signal the actions of a business that is growing, not singing a swan song.

Perhaps my sensibilities are colored by the environment of Silicon Valley in which I steep all day long. But to me, this looks like a CEO taking on more money to fund more ambitious growth plans, building his executive team, and beginning a global expansion to address new and opportune markets. The fact that Perotti-Brown is taking over as editor does not equate to a succession plan for the job of CEO, the control of the brand, or ownership of the company. Frankly, it's ridiculous that Parker retained control of copy-editing and proofing this long, and the Wine Advocate should have been offered in Chinese starting about three years ago.

Sure we're seeing the dilution of the cult of personality that was Bob Parker, and attempts to replace it with the brand of the Wine Advocate, but that began when he began to cede responsibility for certain geographies to other writers several years ago. I certainly remarked on the nature of the change when Parker decided to have Galloni replace him as critic for California wines.

Of course, as a business shifts, it exposes itself to more risk. Certainly one of the most risky things about this move may be what Teague reported as the plan to have "most of its wine correspondents... become full-time employees, instead of independent contractors."

Getting folks like Antonio Galloni, Neal Martin, and David Schildknecht to convert from work-at-home contractors to full-time employees will take some financial incentives, to be sure. But with more investors on board, such things become possible.

I admit to being a fascinated spectator, like much of the wine industry, and sometimes wonder at the longevity of the Wine Advocate as an institution and as a dominant taste-maker in the world of wine. But on reflection, the news that emerged from today's maelstrom doesn't at all sound like an overweight soprano warming up for a performance.

Comments (5)

12.11.12 at 9:29 AM

One of the biggest things to take away from this, once again, is how POOR Mr Parker actually is at PR.

He was apparently surprised about the fuss this caused? Really!?

Like the timing of the announcement of Mr Miller's departure before, it proves that although he may have a gift with wine, this does not extend to managing communications for the business. Maybe the new investors could bring a bit of that!

12.11.12 at 9:34 AM

Sounds like there's a stirring that is either going to make or brake the future of the Wine Spectator. It's amazing how vague all the behind the curtain going-ons is, even now with all these new details. There's still quite, if I may use, a fan base to the magazine and newsletters. So, in spite of whomever takes over and publishes, there will still be a place for the Spectator.

Thanks for the write-up.

Bill Smart wrote:
12.11.12 at 11:46 AM

Great write up and perspective Alder. I completely agree. If I were Parker, I'd be looking to expand my footprint, grow my business and ultimlately set myself up for a comfortable retirement. Isn't that why we work the hours we work? People get so charged up about this and that. Failure to realize that people are in the business of making MONEY is just nuts to me. Yes, editorial integrity and all that. But I agree with you, this was a business move, pure and simple.

12.12.12 at 12:12 PM

He took 15M and for that sum, which only a group of Asians would pay (a NA group would never see the worth in the BRAND) he has to give up control at all levels, take the money in Singapore, move to Singapore and live happily ever after RP Jr. His tweets to the contrary are FOS.


Alder wrote:
12.12.12 at 12:24 PM


As far as I can tell, all the things you are reporting as fact are mere conjecture on your part. Even the link you supplied indicates that the financial aspects of the deal have not been disclosed. As for the control over the enterprise, your assertion that a certain level of investment requires loss of control is ridiculous. The terms of every investment are different and many such investments in businesses do not involve ceding of control of any aspect of the company.

Comment on this entry

(will not be published)
(optional -- Google will not follow)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Buy My Book!

small_final_covershot_dropshadow.jpg A wine book like no other. Photographs, essays, and wine recommendations. Learn more.

Follow Me On:

Twitter Facebook Pinterest Instagram Delectable Flipboard

Most Recent Entries

Critical Consolidation in Wine What Has California Got Against Wineries? Dirty Money for a Legendary Brand Vinography Images: Tendrils Highlights from Tasting Champagne with the Masters Off to Portugal for a Drink Vinography Images: Hazy Afternoon The Dark Queen of Châteauneuf-du-Pape: Domaine du Pégau Does California Have Too Many AVAs? Vinography Unboxed: Week of October 26, 2014

Favorite Posts From the Archives

Masuizumi Junmai Daiginjo, Toyama Prefecture Wine.Com Gives Retailers (and Consumers) the Finger 1961 Hospices de Beaune Emile Chandesais, Burgundy Wine Over Time The Better Half of My Palate 1999 Királyudvar "Lapis" Tokaji Furmint, Hungary What's Allowed in Your Wine and Winemaking Why Community Tasting Notes Sites Will Fail Appreciating Wine in Context The Soul vs. The Market 1989 Fiorano Botte 48 Semillion,Italy

Archives by Month


Required Reading for Wine Lovers

The Oxford Companion to Wine by Jancis Robinson The Taste of Wine by Emile Peynaud Adventures on the Wine Route by Kermit Lynch Love By the Glass by Dorothy Gaiter & John Brecher Noble Rot by William Echikson The Science of Wine by Jamie Goode The Judgement of Paris by George Taber The Wine Bible by Karen MacNeil The Botanist and the Vintner by Christy Campbell The Emperor of Wine by Elin McCoy The World Atlas of Wine by Hugh Johnson The World's Greatest Wine Estates by Robert M. Parker, Jr.