Text Size:-+

What's In a Name? The AVA Creation Process 2.0

I don't think I've ever had so many e-mails asking me to specifically write about a certain topic here on Vinography. In the past few weeks I've gotten a raft of requests to address the issue that we may refer to in the future as Calistogate 2007.

Regular readers may remember the news that the government indefinitely suspended the process by which new AVA's (American Viticultural Areas) were created. They did this because of a quagmire surrounding the imminent approval of a new AVA in the Napa Valley covering the Calistoga area. The idea being that Calistoga would become the 15th distinct sub-region of the Napa Valley for growing grapes, joining the better known names such as Rutherford, Stag's Leap, and St. Helena.

The process of approving a new AVA is a bit like getting elected to public office. The results do not always reflect which candidate is best for the job. The concept of an AVA, like that of any appellation, is founded in the idea that it represents a region whose environmental characteristics, and their influence on the wine produced in the area, are distinct from those around it. This is straightforward enough. Where things get tricky is the fact that AVAs are like hybrid car engines. Once someone has one, everyone wants one, because if you've got one, you can sell more wine.

The dirty little secret about AVAs is that they make wineries more money. On the flip side, however, the truth about AVAs is that in some cases they truly do describe a significant regional character to their wines.

The world, as it turns out, is not black and white.

Which brings us back to Calistogate 2007. The Calistoga AVA approval process hit a little snag earlier in the year when the government realized that it would have to deal with the fact that there was a winery named Calistoga Cellars that didn't actually make wine from Calistoga. This issue of brand names conflicting with geographical designations is a thorny one, and it apparently was so controversial that it brought the revision of the laws around these designations to a screeching halt earlier in the year. Especially since such things tend to make many people's blood boil in the wine industry. Place names are very sacred cows.

The Tobacco Trade Bureau, or TTB, which oversees this process as part of the US Department of Treasury recently released its new and improved proposals for how to handle the issue represented by Calistoga Cellars, as well as all future such conflicts. Not surprisingly, as is always the case when Government has to decide something, there are a lot of unhappy people out there. Perhaps none more so than the Napa Valley Vintners association, whose members were chiefly responsible for the petition to create the Calistoga AVA in the first place, and who do not count Calistoga Cellars among their members.

The government's solution is a typical hedge. Folks that have been using a name for several decades are grandfathered in without the need to change the name of their winery just because there is a new geographical designation that exists of the same name. More recently established wineries are allowed to use the name, provided they offer a statement on their label that "sufficiently dispels the impression that the geographic area suggested by the brand name is indicative of the origin of the wine."

Jason Haas of Tablas Creek Vineyards spent some time on his blog recently describing why he thinks this is an issue. Essentially it leaves open the possibility for someone to create a wine called "Rutherford Gold*" with a tiny little statement somewhere on the label that reads "oh, by the way, this wine ain't really made in Rutherford." Which is sort of sneaky and not really a good idea.

In the true governmental tradition, however, it's not really the main issue addressed by the legislation that presents the greatest problem. In the case of the recent TTB proposal, there is some additional language that is far more worrying, which would completely change the way that AVAs work in America.

This language suggests that in cases where an AVA is completely contained by another one (think Paso Robles inside the Central Coast, or the Russian River Valley inside Sonoma County) wine made in the inner AVA would not be able to carry the name of the outer AVA.

Which means, as far as I understand it, that you could have a Stag's Leap Cabernet that wasn't allowed to be labeled as coming from the Napa Valley.

Which is just plain stupid, and about what you'd expect from Washington politicians these days.

It's hard sometimes to know what to think about all this naming of appellations, and the fierce protectionism of geographical origins. I tend to have a certain amount of ambivalence about the whole thing. Is Calistoga Cellars really hurting anyone? On the other hand, it's a good thing for consumers to know where their wine comes from, and to not have a false impression of its origin drive their purchase decision.

I can't help feeling like the whole problem with this issue is that the government is involved in the first place. Why can't we set up a body of independent, non-partisan, tee-totaling scientists who can spend all their time figuring out which regions of the world really are distinct from a climate and geologic perspective and draw the lines according to empirical data? I guess that's like hoping we could agree on whether or not to teach evolution in our schools.

I encourage you to read more on this subject from Tom Wark at Fermentation.

Comments (6)

Arthur wrote:
12.11.07 at 11:54 PM


I like it!

Steve wrote:
12.12.07 at 8:36 AM

Hey Alder, this is a thorny topic and it's likely to remain so, with more and more AVAs coming up. Personally, I think AVA usage should be very strictly controlled, so consumers have an absolute assurance of origin. By the way, the Stags Leap AVA has no apostrophe.

razmaspaz wrote:
12.12.07 at 9:05 AM

What happens when I start making wine in East Rutherford, NJ? Am I allowed to call my wine Rutherford Gold then?

12.12.07 at 9:25 AM


You mean Calistoga is not already its own AVA? I have long considered it one! You mean the little spot over by Silverado Country Club is causing all this concern. Why did they allow a place in the Oak Knoll to call itself that in the first place if this would be a problem down the road. Are these not the salme people who approved the name for use? If they are to change the AVA name why not call it what the Indians did and my family as a kid Cali?

wineguy wrote:
12.12.07 at 10:18 AM

My recollection is that Fred Franzia tried to label a bunch of his wines with "Napa" in the name, although they had nothing to do with Napa. That backstory is part this controversy as well.

tom farella wrote:
12.13.07 at 1:33 PM

Yes, quagmire indeed. We Coombsville producers are pretty interested in this dustup for similar reasons since our regional group (myself, not included) decided to petition this area as "Tulocay" instead of the obvious "Coombsville." There is, of course, Bill Cadman's longstanding brand "Tulocay" that would have ended up in a similar bind with the existing process. Since that petition was filed while Calistogate was being masticated, I can't help but think that TTB staffers were looking at each other and wondering what to do next. Pull the plug was the first reaction. I was pleased that they raised the issue for public comment rather quickly and much of their propasal made sense about grandfathering, etc. The "nesting" of AVAs is the big issue, here. NO one is going to go for this new proposal - oh, except Calistoga Cellars. Cheers!

Comment on this entry

(will not be published)
(optional -- Google will not follow)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Buy My Book!

small_final_covershot_dropshadow.jpg A wine book like no other. Photographs, essays, and wine recommendations. Learn more.

Follow Me On:

Twitter Facebook Pinterest Instagram Delectable Flipboard

Most Recent Entries

Vinography Images: Tendrils Highlights from Tasting Champagne with the Masters Off to Portugal for a Drink Vinography Images: Hazy Afternoon The Dark Queen of Châteauneuf-du-Pape: Domaine du Pégau Does California Have Too Many AVAs? Vinography Unboxed: Week of October 26, 2014 Vinography Images: Shades of Autumn 16th Annual Pinot Fest: November 22, 2014 Hang out with the World's Top Wine Writers. For Free.

Favorite Posts From the Archives

Masuizumi Junmai Daiginjo, Toyama Prefecture Wine.Com Gives Retailers (and Consumers) the Finger 1961 Hospices de Beaune Emile Chandesais, Burgundy Wine Over Time The Better Half of My Palate 1999 Királyudvar "Lapis" Tokaji Furmint, Hungary What's Allowed in Your Wine and Winemaking Why Community Tasting Notes Sites Will Fail Appreciating Wine in Context The Soul vs. The Market 1989 Fiorano Botte 48 Semillion,Italy

Archives by Month


Required Reading for Wine Lovers

The Oxford Companion to Wine by Jancis Robinson The Taste of Wine by Emile Peynaud Adventures on the Wine Route by Kermit Lynch Love By the Glass by Dorothy Gaiter & John Brecher Noble Rot by William Echikson The Science of Wine by Jamie Goode The Judgement of Paris by George Taber The Wine Bible by Karen MacNeil The Botanist and the Vintner by Christy Campbell The Emperor of Wine by Elin McCoy The World Atlas of Wine by Hugh Johnson The World's Greatest Wine Estates by Robert M. Parker, Jr.